Abstrakt
Concerns persist regarding the lack of promotion of students’ scientific inquiry processes in undergraduate physics laboratories. The consensus in the literature is that, especially in the early years of undergraduate physics programs, students’ laboratory work is characterized by recipe type, step-by-step instructions for activities where the aim is often confirmation of an already well-established physics principle or concept. In response to evidence reflecting these concerns at their university, the authors successfully secured funding for this study. A mixed-method design was employed. In the 2011/2012 academic year baseline data were collected. A quantitative survey, the Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Learning Environment Scale (UPLLES) was developed, validated, and used to explore students’ perceptions of their physics laboratory environments. Analysis of data from the UPLLES and from interviews confirmed the concerns evident in the literature and in a previous evaluation of laboratories undertaken in 2002. To address these concerns the activities that students were to perform in the laboratory section of the course/s were re/designed to engage students in more inquiry oriented thinking and activity. In Fall 2012, the newly developed laboratory activities and tutorials, were implemented for the first time in PHYS124; a first year course. These changes were accompanied by structured training of teaching assistants and changes to the structure of the evaluation of students’ laboratory performance. At the end of that term the UPLLES was administered (n = 266) and interviews with students conducted (n = 16) to explore their perceptions of their laboratory environments. Statistically significant differences (p<.001) between the students in the PHYS 124 classes of 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 across all dimensions were found. Effect sizes of 0.82 to 1.3, between the views of students in the first semester physics classes of 2011/2012 and 2012/2013, were also calculated suggesting positive changes in the laboratory inquiry orientation. In their interviews, students confirmed and detailed these positive changes while still noting areas for future improvement.Reference
Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
, 39–55.
Beamish, J. et al. (2002). Report to the curriculum committee of the undergraduate
laboratories review committee. Department of Physics, University of Alberta.
Chang, C.Y. & Mao, S.L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes
with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92,
–346.
Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research
paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge: MA.
Luckie, D.B. et al. (2004). Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology
curriculum increases student learning: a four-year study of “Teams and Streams.”
Advanced Physiology Education, 28(4), 199–209.
McGinn, M.K. & Roth, W. M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific
practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational
Researcher, 28, 14–24.
National Academy of Sciences. (1996) The national science education standards.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education
standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Center for Science,
Mathematics, and Engineering Education.
Russell, C. B. et al. (2008). Student perceptions of the purpose and function of the
laboratory in science: A grounded theory study. International Journal for the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2, 1–14.
Thomas, G.P., Meldrum, A. & Beamish, J. (2013). Conceptualization, development and
validation of an instrument for investigating elements of undergraduate physics
laboratory learning environments: The UPLLES (Undergraduate Physics Laboratory
Learning Environment Survey). European Journal of Physics Education, 4(4), 28–40.
Weaver, G.C. et al. (2008). Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in
undergraduate science. Nature chemical biology, 4, 577–580.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can
investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?
Science Education, 86, 112–143.